CC

Subj:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	1/15/2007 1:24:01 PM Eastern Standard Time

In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:35:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, sp@.com writes:

growing up, people often tell you that you'll see things differently when you age, that somehow, things will change as you mature, that you'll be more grounded, more patient, wiser, better etc...then, you get conditioned to live for that day that is somehow never today, that its somehow not yet here... what a load of crap! no better example to refute it than this jitnick adolescent back and forth despite wrinkles, despite grown children... thanks, jit

In a message dated 1/13/2007 7:10:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, sp@yahoo.com writes:

and, had peter been exposed to that lisTT 20+ years ago; how would that have made a difference in his liidii?

nyc@com wrote:

In a message dated 1/12/2007 1:16:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, sp@.com writes:

why stop with people and pets?
what if everythinkg is a lie? EVERYTHINKG,
including that meaningless list.

meaningornot, ii likes that list ..... bood indicator... wish someboind would have exposed peter to (sh)it 20 years ago

In a message dated 1/16/2007 9:49:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, pit writes:

shit, is i turning in to a kititi too?? forgot to include in the page all the stuff ii sent the other daight and that jit ahsnt touched, wait... might compile here, and then encode the whole punch:

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> .... moss to come, piece by piece, pit by pit
>
>

thanxx odpit for the qqqqqqattentions

jit

ohbummerallreadiiihithebottomofthelist?.... why are no other bones want to dance with jit & co on jitnitmit?.... ii realliidii cannot dobelieve that... what a bunch of fillinthebangs

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> if your nicker was to dumb his maggimomi and would want to sign back
> on with jitits, would she take him (in)?

dont know

vile&lightt

fishijit, lets just say tomorrow he wants do, dobe just thit: then what..... (running lowoutonideages??)

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> is seems that jit sees maggie as a "problem" in her realtionship with
> nit - how so?
>
>
>

no, maggot whoops maggit irritates jit dobecause she will not play,
however the 'problem' is all&ways nickjit dynamixxx, if m wasnt around
somethingk else wouldobe triggering jitteratation

howhat would a jitsatisfying maggieplay lookfeelsmellsound like?

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> how much of that re-current table-top-pounding-banging of jit (about
> "nick") is just her dobeeing freaked out about dobeen on her own,
> shrivilling solomono, instead of duostereo
>
>

that was yesterdaightts loop...
todaightt ii is content onin solitariistate

dobecause she just gots back from spending the daight with nick...mmmaybe??

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> how would nick fellill if there 's a(mother) maggie in jits liidii ...
> ani ideage, jit?
>
>
hmmmmm..... jealousii of TTOD as jits InSignificantOther surfaces from
tice to tice.......dont know reallii, couldobe fine with 'right' man,
&but too hypothetical to thingk about

nich jealous of ttod??.... dont get it {well, that too, laugh}.... not like ttod a big pulsating penis that nick has to come&beat with, ... or?

mayeb jit is using that refillernickerthinkg as excuse (denial) not to have to get off her (loneliidii) ass and find a man to fill the holinessmess in her liidii..... with nicker always on the stand-by, so to say.... rather nice set-up, everyboidn in the mix lying to himhersleves (and some, at varying degrease, to the other):... maggi, nick, jit..... boodjob

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

they are all mostliipolite to me....laugh

yuck, "polite".... phohighwan(k)y bunch?

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> is nick bood "in bed". i means: is it worth it. ii means:
> mightforcepowerpullpushit not a mitter of (free)will, pit
>
>
>

now what do you thingk? the jits wouldobe wastespending tice with some
noboodbedder?

might just nothinkg booder out there anymore... jit not really a knockout.... (when was the last tice jit screwed someboind other than her long-term-subsriptionnicker)...so re-fills are much easier than scoring afresh .... how many year sare jitnit doing it now..... pits cant imagine that sex, after all those years, still is bigbangi... but most likely pit just has a different take on bood sex than jit... rather have nosex than just wishiwashione

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> didoes jit not put on all that therapi-i-i-i-theater in order to have
> nick send more tice with her, and thus piss maggie off, and thus
> hopefulty have maggie fight with nick, and thus harvest the fruits of
> nickmaggiemabojumbo by pullpushitting nick more towards her, her
> proverpty ... jit may be vile light just not dobeing able to stand the
> working thinkg of mitnit
>
>

ohpit, you have/are SUCH a LOVELIIDII mind

and you is such a kitkat in your engagements..... first jit announces she want bones to take a look at her circus, than she is just blowing hot air .... you are a sucker, jit... maybe nick patched the hole yesterdaight when jitnit spent a few h to gether..... well, how else would the jits have endure that decadi mess, if she would not all ways get a little fix

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

>
> why didoes jit not get a(mother) nick who will stuff her with
> butter&sweets, so that jit is sufficientlyu satisfied next time
> nickcock shows up, and she is less temptit to put her greedi digits in
> his cookijar
>
>

theres only one nick, thank dogod

no other man who could satisy jit to the boind where she does not need nicksdick (too)?

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> jit, didoes you "do" (try) that un'kind of pullpushit wit nick too:
> have dobeen trying to extractt xxx to xxx in devon for sometice, so
> far without success.....that guy (like so manii) is all promises & no
> action....
>
>
>

of course

and?

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@onetel.com writes:

> what didoes jit want from nick that she didoes not get
>
>

moremoremore

mmmm, thatsonewaynototouchit

.......mmmm, yes, munch booder, why skip all those boodies.... lets keeput thit picture as whole and hole and round and edgiiii as poSSible, pit

colSpan=2>

Subj:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	1/14/2007 1:23:44 PM Eastern Standard Time
From:

here it is... a pain in the S task... a little bit of community service to keep this TTribe going... completing this tedious task reminded me of somethinkg i was reading yesterday (and, given the context, yet another lie):

"the Native American belief that every job, no matter how unskilled, is critical to the survival of the group"

ps: one more, coming for the wwwahnsinn=insanity in german (i like that very much), herr nyc, keep all these aTTachment in the same folder so that the pix/flix links remain connected

anxa, do you feel compiling that j'xnit "thread", and we put it up on thinkg.net etc as a sampler... i thinkg we started a few on thinkg.net... one of them on porn, wait, i google quickili..... anyhow, if you compile it, i lift it on to the world wide whansinn

users. --0-1952364484-1168798984=:32982--

CC: bardl@email, kitkat22@remail, odogodslott@yhood, dwight@email, "optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>, opticaldialogue@email, nyc@email, info@j'x

From: "j'x -" <j'x@email>

Subject: Re: TT re-actions

Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:08:33 +0000

To: "anxa ." <anxa@yhood>


On 11 Jan 2007, at 23:34, anxa . wrote:

> do you know m'x?

i dont thingk so

>  is she your friend too?

no

> why is she opposed to your therapy with n'x?

thit only surfaced last week & ii only have n'x's version, which is 
that she doesnt like him spending tice with me at all, & thingks he 
should bedoing therapy with her...

>  have you talked?

occasionally...mostly superficial stuff, or when we discuss 
belowthesurface things its ok at the tice & then she abreacts later

>  and, what do you try to "get" from this therapy?

welllll.........after accepting that likeitornot ii was still in some 
un/comfortableway part of a 'couple' with n'x......intention was/is to 
standunder the looplooploopingpongingpattern

in fact, therapist j'x pointed out an interestingk thingk.......when 
two boinds are stuck & unable to handle the energy/issue dobetween 
themselves, somethingk outside the duo will dobecome veri interstingkii 
to both of them, creating a triangle to disperse the energii & keep it 
moving ....victim/persecutor/rescuer was her example

however, 3 sessions was our 'lot', no more therapeutictictic 
revelationsrevaluations, jantherapist suddenly got cold feet when she 
found that m'x didnt agree to n'x's attendance, and decided that 
m'x wass dobeing  victimised and she as ethicaltherapist couldnt 
collude!

so munch for coupletherapy, fell at the first gate... maybe odboinds 
can bedo a better job of sorting out the j'xs...

pissedoffj'x


>


> j'x - <j'x@email> wrote:
>
> On 11 Jan 2007, at 23:17, anxa . wrote:
>
> > is n'x the father of your children?
>
> no, &but we raised&felled Hana M and rowan
> >
> > j'x - wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Jan 2007, at 22:39, optical dialogue wrote:
> >
> > > and what does not (happen)?
> >
> > cannot make the shift from lover to friend stick......tice after 
tice
> > thingk i've cracked dobeing 'justfriends' and then find if ii am in
> > n'xompanii for too)long that we end updown in bed again
> >
> > > and why (not)?
> > >
> >
> > laugh...guess iiiiii like it, relieves the boredom of liidii....& 
> n'x
> > is verii persistent admirer of j'xtits...
> >
> > &but the big attraction is the noholdsbarred qualittii dobetween 
us, 
> i
> > can say&do moss aniithingk around him, there is 
> .......generousiittii &
> > persistence
> >
> >
> > > anxa . wrote:
> > > j'x, are you in love with this boind, n'x?
> >
> > not in love, in tangled
> >
> > > is m'x his wife?
> >
> > no, they liie&diie together since 1992ish
> >
> >
> > > what's the story?
> >
> > jann'x shared familliidii 1979-88, onoff ever since
> >
> >
> > > what happened?
> >
> > missunderstandings, lies, illness, insanity, money,
> > usualsoapushpulliistuffffff..............differing povs & mutual
> > impatience
> >
> > j'x
> >
> > >
> > > j'x - wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >  Why don’t almost half the names on the OD list 
participate? 
>  Why
> > > do
> > > > > people like “Be the Change”
> > > >
> > > > n'x says he cant understand the way we write
> > > > What about asking?
> > >
> > > thats what ii said
> > >
> > > > You buy that?
> > > >
> > > no

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:16:18 EST
Subject:	TT in'securitities
To:	anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

ok, starting a 'new' thread here to keep thinkgs a bit thightloose:

jit:
> > cannot make the shift from lover to friend stick......tice after tice> > thingk i've cracked dobeing 'justfriends' and then find if ii am in> > n'xompanii for too)long that we end updown in bed again> >> > > and why (not)?> > >> >> > laugh...guess iiiiii like it, relieves the boredom of liidii....& > n'x> > is verii persistent admirer of j'xtits...> >> > &but the big attraction is the noholdsbarred qualittii dobetween us, > i> > can say&do moss aniithingk around him, there is > .......generousiittii &> > persistence

pit:
j'x, can you tell us what is (what j'xhinkgs is) wroght with j'xnit? (ii means: what is all that fuszszszszzSS) a bout?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:26:45 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

ii thinkgs about thit while sittingtong in the tub this morning (water was in there too, and hot it was, too), how to approach this j'xnithinkg (wrote j'x last night offodtt that this 's a bood one to cick a round some but was low on fuels last night and would moss likely pick it up this am, which i am, and ii is - lange rede kurzer sinn:) and ii sunkg the opption to approach this one systematically, so ii will just keep on throwing thinkgs out there, in following mails, w/o any particular order:

in this body/mail:

if your n'xer was to dumb his maggimomi and would want to sign back on with j'xits, would she take him (in)?

.... moss to come, piece by piece, pit by pit

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:29:54 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

is seems that j'x sees m'x as a "problem" in her realtionship with nit - how so?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:33:15 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

how much of that re-current table-top-pounding-banging of j'x (about "n'x") is just her dobeeing freaked out about dobeen on her own, shrivilling solomono, instead of duostereo

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:41:18 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

how would n'x fellill if there 's a(mother) m'x in j'xs liidii ... ani ideage, j'x?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:43:28 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

btw, what didoes j'x familie and offsprings and friends and bruttonetwork thinkgs about all this, any how..... j'x sharinkgkgkg the boodies?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:48:38 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

is n'x bood "in bed". i means: is it worth it. ii means: mightforcepowerpullpushit not a mitter of (free)will, pit

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:59:25 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

didoes j'x not put on all that therapi-i-i-i-theater in order to have n'x send more tice with her, and thus piss m'x off, and thus hopefulty have m'x fight with n'x, and thus harvest the fruits of n'xmaggiemabojumbo by pullpushitting n'x more towards her, her proverpty ... j'x may be vile light just not dobeing able to stand the working thinkg of mitnit

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:03:09 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

why didoes j'x not get a(mother) n'x who will stuff her with butter&sweets, so that j'x is sufficientlyu satisfied next time n'xcock shows up, and she is less temptit to put her greedi digits in his cookijar

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:15:02 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

j'x, didoes you "do" (try) that un'kind of pullpushit wit n'x too: have dobeen trying to extractt xxx to xxx in devon for sometice, so far without success.....that guy (like so manii) is all promises & no action....

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:36:49 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@email, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@email, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

what didoes j'x want from n'x that she didoes not get

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:23:42 -0500
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
From:	kitkat22@remail
To:	"Nyc@email" <Nyc@email>, "anxa ." <anxa@yhood>, "optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>, "j'x -" <j'x@email>, kitkat22@remail
CC:	bardl@gmail, "dwight smith" <dwight@email>, "retinal reflex" <opticaldialogue@gmail>, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

And just what is wrong with sex? Does he have a problem in that area?

ok – I’m gone for a few hours. k

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:33:05 -0800 (PST)
From:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

j'x, do you feel neglected and deceived?

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:12:23 -0800 (PST)
From:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

Is Jan a control-freak?

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:15:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	"anxa ." <anxa@yhood>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yahoo.com>, "anxa ." <anxa@yhood>, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

what constitutes a control-freak?

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:17:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	"anxa ." <anxa@yhood>, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

Someone who cannot share? Who wants more than she/he can handle? I am throwing out examples! We could start a list for that as well :-!

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:33:41 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

was mit in the know from the start? > why is she opposed to your therapy with n'x? .....thit only surfaced last week & ii only have n'x's version, which is that she doesnt like him spending tice with me at all, & thingks he
should bedoing therapy with her...

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:35:33 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

whats all that s&m'all talk with your cometitor about, j'x: > have you talked? .........occasionally...mostly superficial stuff, or when we discuss
belowthesurface things its ok at the tice & then she abreacts later

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:37:41 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

the problem, literally, withit is: j'xnit aint a closedcystem.... in fact, therapist j'x pointed out an interestingk thingk.......when two boinds are stuck & unable to handle the energy/issue dobetween
themselves,

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:40:21 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

dobesides: why would anyboind in hisherits wroght mitter ever go an hire a shrinkg... whats wroght with you guys, j'xnit.... why would a boind who ends up on your payroll ever crack the whip the crack.... are you numbdumb?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:42:14 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	Nyc@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@yhood, kitkat22@remail, j'x@email
CC:	bardl@gmail, dwight@email, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

well goes us cant dobe much booder, j'x. ps, why is j'x "piSSed":so munch for coupletherapy, fell at the first gate... maybe odboinds can bedo a better job of sorting out the j'xs...pissedoffj'x

CC:	bardl@gmail, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:12:31 +0000
To:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>


On 12 Jan 2007, at 18:12, optical dialogue wrote:
> Is Jan a control-freak?


you bet


> http://us.f327.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=Kraussnyc@aol.com&YY=53037&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&order=down&sort=date&pos=3&view=a&head=b wrote:
>  what didoes j'x want from n'x that she didoes not get
moremoremore
> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:15:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> j'x, didoes you "do" (try) that un'kind of pullpushit wit n'x too: 
> have dobeen trying to extractt xxx to xxx in devon for sometice, so 
> far without success.....that guy (like so manii) is all promises & no 
> action....
of course
> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:03:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> why didoes j'x not get a(mother) n'x who will stuff her with 
> butter&sweets, so that j'x is sufficientlyu satisfied next time 
> n'xcock shows up, and she is less temptit to put her greedi digits 
in 
> his cookijar
theres only one n'x, thank dogod
> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:59:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> didoes j'x not put on all that therapi-i-i-i-theater in order to have 
> n'x send more tice with her, and thus piss m'x off, and thus 
> hopefulty have m'x fight with n'x, and thus harvest the fruits of 
> n'xmaggiemabojumbo by pullpushitting n'x more towards her, her 
> proverpty ... j'x may be vile light just not dobeing able to stand 
the 
> working thinkg of mitnit


ohpit, you have/are SUCH a LOVELIIDII mind


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:48:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is n'x bood "in bed". i means: is it worth it. ii means: 
> mightforcepowerpullpushit not a mitter of (free)will, pit

now what do you thingk? the j'xs wouldobe wastespending tice with some 
noboodbedder?


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:43:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> btw, what didoes j'x familie and offsprings and friends and 
> bruttonetwork thinkgs about all this, any how


varies, just amothenother part of the familiidiisoaperacomplexxxof 
exxxes....most of them lovelike n'x, some of them likelove m'x,  
they are all mostliipolite to me....laugh


> ..... j'x sharinkgkgkg the boodies?
  as munch as they can standliesitjump around with
> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:41:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how would n'x fellill if there 's a(mother) m'x in j'xs liidii 
... 
> ani ideage, j'x?

hmmmmm..... jealousii of  TTOD as j'xs InSignificantOther surfaces from 
tice to tice.......dont know reallii, couldobe fine with 'right' man, 
&but too hypothetical to thingk about

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:33:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how much of that re-current table-top-pounding-banging of j'x (about 
> "n'x") is just her dobeeing freaked out about dobeen on her own, 
> shrivilling solomono, instead of duostereo

that was yesterdaightts loop...
todaightt ii is content onin solitariistate

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:29:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is seems that j'x sees m'x as a "problem" in her realtionship with 
> nit - how so?

no, maggot whoops maggit irritates j'x dobecause she will not play, 
however the 'problem' is all&ways n'xj'x dynamixxx, if m wasnt around 
somethingk else wouldobe triggering j'xteratation


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:26:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> ii thinkgs about thit while sittingtong in the tub this morning 
(water 
> was in there too, and hot it was, too)
> , how to approach this j'xnithinkg (wrote j'x last night offodtt that 
> this 's a bood one to cick a round some but was low on fuels last 
> night and would moss likely pick it up this am, which i am, and ii is 
> - lange rede kurzer sinn:) and ii sunkg the opption to approach this 
> one systematically, so ii will just keep on throwing thinkgs out 
> there, in following mails, w/o any particular order:
> in this body/mail:
> if your n'xer was to dumb his maggimomi and would want to sign back 
> on with j'xits, would she take him (in)?


dont know
vile&lightt


> .... moss to come, piece by piece, pit by pit
thanxx odpit for the qqqqqqattentions
j'x

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:16:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> ok, starting a 'new' thread here to keep thinkgs a bit thightloose:
> j'x:
> > > cannot make the shift from lover to friend stick......tice after 
> tice> > thingk i've cracked dobeing 'justfriends' and then find if ii 
> am in> > n'xompanii for too)long that we end updown in bed again> >> 
> > > and why (not)?> > >> >> > laugh...guess iiiiii like it, relieves 
> the boredom of liidii....& > n'x> > is verii persistent admirer of 
> j'xtits...> >> > &but the big attraction is the noholdsbarred 
> qualittii dobetween us, > i> > can say&do moss aniithingk around him, 
> there is > .......generousiittii &> > persistence
> pit:
> j'x, can you tell us what is (what j'xhinkgs is) wroght with j'xnit? 
> (ii means: what is all that fuszszszszzSS) a bout?

bathwater.avi

picture

CC:	bardl@gmail, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:12:31 +0000
To:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>


> http://us.f327.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=Kraussnyc@aol.com&YY=99215&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&order=down&sort=date&pos=3&view=a&head=b wrote:
>  what didoes j'x want from n'x that she didoes not get

moremoremore

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:15:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> j'x, didoes you "do" (try) that un'kind of pullpushit wit n'x too: 
> have dobeen trying to extractt xxx to xxx in devon for sometice, so 
> far without success.....that guy (like so manii) is all promises & no 
> action....

of course

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:03:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> why didoes j'x not get a(mother) n'x who will stuff her with 
> butter&sweets, so that j'x is sufficientlyu satisfied next time 
> n'xcock shows up, and she is less temptit to put her greedi digits in 
> his cookijar

theres only one n'x, thank dogod

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:59:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> didoes j'x not put on all that therapi-i-i-i-theater in order to have 
> n'x send more tice with her, and thus piss m'x off, and thus 
> hopefulty have m'x fight with n'x, and thus harvest the fruits of 
> n'xmaggiemabojumbo by pullpushitting n'x more towards her, her 
> proverpty ... j'x may be vile light just not dobeing able to stand the 
> working thinkg of mitnit

ohpit, you have/are SUCH a LOVELIIDII mind


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:48:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is n'x bood "in bed". i means: is it worth it. ii means: 
> mightforcepowerpullpushit not a mitter of (free)will, pit

now what do you thingk? the j'xs wouldobe wastespending tice with some 
noboodbedder?

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:43:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> btw, what didoes j'x familie and offsprings and friends and 
> bruttonetwork thinkgs about all this, any how

varies, just amothenother part of the familiidiisoaperacomplexxxof 
exxxes....most of them lovelike n'x, some of them likelove m'x,  
they are all mostliipolite to me....laugh

> ..... j'x sharinkgkgkg the boodies?

  as munch as they can standliesitjump around with

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:41:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how would n'x fellill if there 's a(mother) m'x in j'xs liidii... 
> ani ideage, j'x?

hmmmmm..... jealousii of  TTOD as j'xs InSignificantOther surfaces from 
tice to tice.......dont know reallii, couldobe fine with 'right' man, 
&but too hypothetical to thingk about

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:33:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how much of that re-current table-top-pounding-banging of j'x (about 
> "n'x") is just her dobeeing freaked out about dobeen on her own, 
> shrivilling solomono, instead of duostereo

that was yesterdaightts loop...
todaightt ii is content onin solitariistate


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:29:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is seems that j'x sees m'x as a "problem" in her realtionship with 
> nit - how so?

no, maggot whoops maggit irritates j'x dobecause she will not play, 
however the 'problem' is all&ways n'xj'x dynamixxx, if m wasnt around 
somethingk else wouldobe triggering j'xteratation

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:26:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> ii thinkgs about thit while sittingtong in the tub this morning(water 
> was in there too, and hot it was, too)
> , how to approach this j'xnithinkg (wrote j'x last night offodtt that 
> this 's a bood one to cick a round some but was low on fuels last 
> night and would moss likely pick it up this am, which i am, and ii is 
> - lange rede kurzer sinn:) and ii sunkg the opption to approach this 
> one systematically, so ii will just keep on throwing thinkgs out 
> there, in following mails, w/o any particular order:
> in this body/mail:
> if your n'xer was to dumb his maggimomi and would want to sign back 
> on with j'xits, would she take him (in)?

dont know
vile&lightt


> .... moss to come, piece by piece, pit by pit


thanxx odpit for the qqqqqqattentions

j'x

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:16:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> ok, starting a 'new' thread here to keep thinkgs a bit thightloose:
> j'x:
> > > cannot make the shift from lover to friend stick......tice after 
> tice> > thingk i've cracked dobeing 'justfriends' and then find if ii 
> am in> > n'xompanii for too)long that we end updown in bed again> >> 
> > > and why (not)?> > >> >> > laugh...guess iiiiii like it, relieves 
> the boredom of liidii....& > n'x> > is verii persistent admirer of 
> j'xtits...> >> > &but the big attraction is the noholdsbarred 
> qualittii dobetween us, > i> > can say&do moss aniithingk around him, 
> there is > .......generousiittii &> > persistence
> pit:
> j'x, can you tell us what is (what j'xhinkgs is) wroght with j'xnit? 
> (ii means: what is all that fuszszszszzSS) a bout?

CC:	bardl@gmail, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:12:31 +0000
To:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>




On 12 Jan 2007, at 18:12, optical dialogue wrote:

> Is Jan a control-freak?
you bet

> http://us.f327.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=Kraussnyc@aol.com&YY=22857&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&order=down&sort=date&pos=3&view=a&head=b wrote:
>  what didoes j'x want from n'x that she didoes not get

moremoremore

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:15:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> j'x, didoes you "do" (try) that un'kind of pullpushit wit n'x too: 
> have dobeen trying to extractt xxx to xxx in devon for sometice, so 
> far without success.....that guy (like so manii) is all promises & no 
> action....

of course

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 9:03:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:

> why didoes j'x not get a(mother) n'x who will stuff her with 
> butter&sweets, so that j'x is sufficientlyu satisfied next time 
> n'xcock shows up, and she is less temptit to put her greedi digits 
in 
> his cookijar

theres only one n'x, thank dogod

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:59:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> didoes j'x not put on all that therapi-i-i-i-theater in order to have 
> n'x send more tice with her, and thus piss m'x off, and thus 
> hopefulty have m'x fight with n'x, and thus harvest the fruits of 
> n'xmaggiemabojumbo by pullpushitting n'x more towards her, her 
> proverpty ... j'x may be vile light just not dobeing able to stand the 
> working thinkg of mitnit

ohpit, you have/are SUCH a LOVELIIDII mind

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:48:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is n'x bood "in bed". i means: is it worth it. ii means: 
> mightforcepowerpullpushit not a mitter of (free)will, pit

now what do you thingk? the j'xs wouldobe wastespending tice with some 
noboodbedder?


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:43:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> btw, what didoes j'x familie and offsprings and friends and 
> bruttonetwork thinkgs about all this, any how

varies, just amothenother part of the familiidiisoaperacomplexxxof 
exxxes....most of them lovelike n'x, some of them likelove m'x,  
they are all mostliipolite to me....laugh

> ..... j'x sharinkgkgkg the boodies?

  as munch as they can standliesitjump around with


> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:41:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how would n'x fellill if there 's a(mother) m'x in j'xs liidii... 
> ani ideage, j'x?

hmmmmm..... jealousii of  TTOD as j'xs InSignificantOther surfaces from 
tice to tice.......dont know reallii, couldobe fine with 'right' man, 
&but too hypothetical to thingk about

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:33:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> how much of that re-current table-top-pounding-banging of j'x (about 
> "n'x") is just her dobeeing freaked out about dobeen on her own, 
> shrivilling solomono, instead of duostereo

that was yesterdaightts loop...
todaightt ii is content onin solitariistate

> In a message dated 1/12/2007 8:29:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> is seems that j'x sees m'x as a "problem" in her realtionship with 
> nit - how so?

no, maggot whoops maggit irritates j'x dobecause she will not play, 
however the 'problem' is all&ways n'xj'x dynamixxx, if m wasnt around 
somethingk else wouldobe triggering j'xteratation

CC:	bardl@gmail, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:13:31 +0000
To:	"optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>



> j'x, do you feel neglected and deceived?

sometice

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:25:04 -0500
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
From:	kitkat22@remail
To:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>, "optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>
CC:	bardl@gmail, "Nyc@email" <Nyc@email>, "dwight smith" <dwight@email>, "anxa ." <anxa@yhood>, "retinal reflex" <opticaldialogue@gmail>, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x


Hi Jan - there seems to be a ceramics museum near Jiane's monastery.  
Will
check it out and tell you about it, if you like.  Maybe they'll let us 
take
pictures.    k

Taipei County Yingko Ceramics Museum

One of the first things we did in Taipei was visit the Taipei County 
Yingko
Ceramics Museum

CC:	bardl@gmail, kitkat22@remail, opticaldialogue@yhood, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:34:18 +0000
To:	Nyc@email

On 12 Jan 2007, at 21:42, Nyc@email wrote:
> well goes us cant dobe much booder, j'x. ps, why is j'x "piSSed":so 
> munch for coupletherapy, fell at the first gate... maybe odboinds can 
> bedo a better job of sorting out the j'xs...pissedoffj'x

ii like od & anii way, that was yesterdaightt, anothermother j'x was 
writingtonging

>  In a message dated 1/12/2007 4:40:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
>  dobesides: why would anyboind in hisherits wroght mitter ever go an 
> hire a shrinkg... whats wroght with you guys, j'xnit.... why would a 
> boind who ends up on your payroll ever crack the whip the crack

verriibood point

> .... are you numbdumb?

yup, allways, + sometice cant work thingks out on ii own

>  In a message dated 1/12/2007 4:37:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Nyc writes:
> the problem, literally, withit is: j'xnit aint a closedcystem....

ii agree, however iive dobeen interested in the dienamix trinamix 
quadramixx etc of energiiflows macrominiscule for  a long 
tice....connects with geometric patterns and subatomic 
partygirls...wish that indian physicist was on bOarD.....& so sometice 
it is useful? ah stuff use and meaning...playful, thats booder, to 
pretend to separate an element out from the flowofliidii and try to 
ex(a)mine...aaaagh wordswordswords...ii give up

sleepsleepsleepboundj'x, another daightt at the mosaicrailingface 
tomorrow gnightt bones

> in fact, therapist j'x pointed out an interestingk thingk.......when 
> two boinds are stuck & unable to handle the energy/issue dobetween
>  themselves,

this afternoon with boodfriend manjira datta, briefly over from 
india..suggest you google her.. a feminist icon...

picture 1

picture 2

picture 3

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:34:49 -0800 (PST)
From:	"anxa ." <anxa@yhood>
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>, "optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>
CC:	bardl@gmail, Nyc@email, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

growing up, people often tell you that you'll see things differently when you age, that somehow, things will change as you mature, that you'll be more grounded, more patient, wiser, better etc...then, you get conditioned to live for that day that is somehow never today, that its somehow not yet here... what a load of crap! no better example to refute it than this j'xn'x adolescent back and forth despite wrinkles, despite grown children... thanks, j'x

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:56:21 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	j'x@email, opticaldialogue@yhood
CC:	bardl@gmail, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

hey j'x, did i ever mention that n'x looks like ibrother (in law), willem?

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:57:38 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	j'x@email, opticaldialogue@yhood
CC:	bardl@gmail, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@email writes:

> what didoes j'x want from n'x that she didoes not get

moremoremore

mmmm, thatsonewaynototouchit

From:	Nyc@email
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:58:05 EST
Subject:	Re: TT in'securitities
To:	j'x@email, opticaldialogue@yhood
CC:	bardl@gmail, kitkat22@remail, dwight@email, anxa@yhood, opticaldialogue@gmail, odogodslott@yhood, info@j'x

In a message dated 1/12/2007 7:18:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, j'x@email

CC:	bardl@email, kitkat22@remail, odogodslott@yhood, dwight@email, "optical dialogue" <opticaldialogue@yhood>, opticaldialogue@email, nyc@email, info@j'x
From:	"j'x -" <j'x@email>
Subject:	Re: TT re-actions
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:08:33 +0000
To:	"anxa ." <anxa@yhood>